FundedNext vs Topstep: Who Offers Better Profit Splits for Futures Traders?

Introduction

In the fast-paced world of futures trading, choosing the right prop firm can significantly impact a trader’s earning potential and long-term success. With numerous firms vying for attention, FundedNext and Topstep stand out as two of the most talked-about platforms. But how do they actually compare—especially when it comes to what matters most: profit splits, payout schedules, account rules, trading platforms, and fees?

For active futures traders, maximizing profit isn’t just about making the right trades—it’s also about selecting a firm that gives you the best structure to succeed, whether that’s higher profit retention, faster access to payouts, or user-friendly evaluation rules. And beyond headline percentages, things like drawdown resets, platform reliability, and fee transparency often make the real difference.

Both FundedNext and Topstep claim to offer trader-friendly funding models—but their approaches are very different. FundedNext leans into flexibility, performance-based scaling, and aggressive split upgrades. Topstep, on the other hand, emphasizes stability, rule clarity, and a generous early profit structure.

To help you decide which firm better aligns with your trading style and growth goals, here’s a quick side-by-side comparison across five key areas: account, profit, rules, platform, and fees.

Feature	FundedNext	Topstep
Account	Scalable with performance	Fixed tiers, less flexible
Profit	80–95% split, first 3 withdrawals full share	100% first $10k, then 90%
Rules	No time limit, strict breach rules	Set cycles, 5‑day rule per payout
Platforms	Tradovate, NinjaTrader, TradingView	TopstepX (primary), NinjaTrader, Quantower, Tradovate, TradingView
Fees	Monthly fee + add‑ons	Flat fee, no extras

Let’s explore each aspect in more depth.

Profit Split: What You Truly Earn

When you see “you keep 80%” or “up to 95%” in a prop firm’s marketing, it’s easy to take it at face value. But in real use, the effective split you earn depends on how the firm handles evaluation phases, upgrades, and conditions around withdrawals.

FundedNext operates with a tiered structure. During its evaluation or challenge stage, traders often receive about 15% of profits as their reward. Once the account is funded, the base split tends to be around 80% to the trader. However, FundedNext offers upgrade paths: consistent performance, scaling, or add-ons can boost your split toward 90% or even 95%. These upgrades reward high-performing traders but come with rules you must carefully navigate.

Topstep’s structure is more transparent and fixed. You receive 100% of your profits up to $10,000 (accumulated across all your accounts), and once you exceed that threshold, subsequent payouts use a 90/10 split in your favor. That means if your trading profits are modest or mid‑range, you may benefit strongly from the full split early on.

In practice, then, Topstep gives an early advantage to smaller traders, while FundedNext offers more upside for those who scale successfully.

Here’s a comparative table summarizing the profit split behavior:

Feature	FundedNext	Topstep
Evaluation / challenge split	~15%	N/A (no payouts in evaluation)
Base funded split	~80%	100% on first $10,000
Higher tier / upgrade split	Up to 90–95%	Always 90% after $10,000
Split flexibility	Can upgrade based on performance	Fixed once you cross threshold

Withdrawal & Payout Mechanics

Even with a great split, your actual gains depend heavily on how often and easily you can withdraw your profits.

With FundedNext, you can request your first Performance Reward 21 days after starting trading, and further rewards every 14 days thereafter in many plans. This schedule gives you more flexibility than firms that force long waiting periods. In some of FundedNext’s futures / legacy models, after passing the challenge, you may withdraw 50% of accumulated profit after each block of 5 benchmark days, and once you complete 30 benchmark days, you may withdraw 100% of your accumulated gains. But note: once you execute your first withdrawal, your drawdown buffer resets to the starting balance, and withdrawing your full reward in one go may trigger a “hard breach” that ends your funding. Also, FundedNext processes payouts within 24 hours in many cases.

Topstep, on the other hand, requires you to accumulate 5 winning trading days (with minimum profit per day) before you can request a payout—and you may only withdraw up to 50% of your account balance in a given request (or a fixed cap, depending on plan). Once you’ve had 30 non‑consecutive winning days, you unlock daily payouts and the ability to withdraw your full account balance (though doing so typically terminates the funding). The minimum withdrawal is $125, and payouts usually arrive in 1–3 business days. After each payout, Topstep resets your maximum loss limit (so your remaining balance becomes what you must defend).

Here’s how the withdrawal mechanisms compare:

Feature	FundedNext	Topstep
First withdrawal timing	After 21 days	After 5 winning days
Cycles / repeat withdrawals	Every 14 days allowable	Must re‑qualify 5 winning days after each payout
Withdrawal cap per request	Up to 50% (pre 30 benchmark days), 100% later	Up to 50% (or fixed cap), full access after 30 winning days
Processing time	~24 hours in many cases	1–3 business days
Reset / breach logic on full withdrawal	First withdrawal resets buffer; withdrawing full reward may cause hard breach	Payout resets max loss limit to zero (must protect remaining balance)

Risk Rules, Drawdowns & Hidden Constraints

Even the best split or payout terms lose value if a rule violation wipes out your account or disqualifies you from rewards.

In FundedNext, withdrawals have lasting consequences. Executing your first withdrawal resets your allowed drawdown buffer back to the starting balance, reducing your risk cushion relative to gains. Importantly, if you withdraw 100% of your Performance Reward in one go, this can trigger a hard breach, shutting down your account. Furthermore, trade rules—such as daily loss limits, instrument restrictions, or disallowed trades around news—are enforced strictly and may vary by plan.

In Topstep’s system, any violation—exceeding drawdown, daily loss breach, rule infractions—can lead to account termination. But one advantage: Topstep calculates maximum loss (drawdown) based on end-of-day balance, meaning it is more forgiving of intraday swings (i.e. unrealized losses during the session) compared to firms that use continuous mark-to-market drawdown metrics. After a payout, your loss buffer is reset to the remaining balance, making your margin for error slimmer moving forward.

Here is a comparison of risk / constraint mechanics:

Constraint	FundedNext	Topstep
Drawdown reset after first withdrawal	Yes, resets to starting balance	Yes, resets to balance post payout
Breach on full withdrawal	Possible “hard breach”	Not exactly same, but full withdrawal terminates account
Drawdown calculation method	Likely stricter continuous rules (varies by plan)	Based on end-of-day balance (more forgiving intraday)
Rule violation consequence	Account closure or loss of reward eligibility	Account closure or suspension of payouts

Infrastructure & Execution: The Hidden Edge

Even the most favorable split and withdrawal terms are only meaningful if your trades execute well. In futures markets, latency, slippage, and connectivity matter, often making the difference between profit and loss for fine-margin strategies. A high-quality VPS (Virtual Private Server) located close to exchange servers or data centers helps minimize latency, ensure stable connectivity, and reduce slippage or missed executions. Over time, that infrastructure edge can wipe out what seems like a 2–5% advantage in split. Offering or recommending a high-performance VPS can be a strong value add for traders comparing two otherwise competitive prop firms.

Conclusion

Choosing between FundedNext and Topstep is not just a matter of which one offers the higher headline split—but about which set of rules, mechanics, and infrastructure align with your trading style, consistency, and growth path.

Topstep appeals to many traders because of its clean and stable structure: you keep 100% of your first $10,000, followed by a 90/10 split, and though withdrawals require you to accumulate five winning days and follow payout cycles, the rules are well documented and long tested. The use of end-of-day drawdown calculation gives some flexibility for intraday volatility, and the reset rules are clear after each payout.

FundedNext, on the other hand, offers more aggressive upside for those who can perform consistently. By starting with a modest reward share during evaluation and escalating to 80%, and then permitting upgrades toward 90–95%, it lets high-performing traders capture more. Withdrawal cycles (first after 21 days, then every 14 days) tend to be more frequent, and the minimums lower. But with greater flexibility comes more complexity: rules around resets, first withdrawal effects, and hard breaches on full withdrawal demand discipline.

If your trading is steady and your aim is consistent profit with predictable cashouts, Topstep may feel safer and more straightforward. If you’re aggressively scaling your P&L, willing to carefully manage risk, and want to maximize every edge, FundedNext may offer more long-term upside—provided you don’t trip its hidden rules. Always keep in mind that your trade execution environment—the latency, slippage, reliability—will often cost or gain you more than small differences in split. Use a high-performing VPS, monitor slippage, and choose the firm whose mechanics align best with your strategy and comfort with rules.

FAQ